Is information about the Original Classification Authority (OCA) required on derivatively classified documents?

Is information about the Original Classification Authority (OCA) required on derivatively classified documents?

• A. True
• B. False
• C. Sometimes
• D. Only if requested

Answer: (B)

The main point is how derivative classifications are marked. When a document is derivatively classified, you must indicate the current classification level and cite the sources that justify it, using a “Derived from” reference to the original material. You don’t need to reveal who originally classified the information—the Original Classification Authority. The identity of the OCA isn’t a required part of the derivative marking, and including it isn’t necessary for handling or declassifying the document. This keeps the focus on the basis for the current classification (the cited sources) rather than on who made the original decision. For example, you would mark the document with its classification level and list the source documents that justify it, such as “Derived from [Source A], Secret (date),” and/or “Derived from [Source B], Top Secret (date),” rather than naming the OCA.

The main point is how derivative classifications are marked. When a document is derivatively classified, you must indicate the current classification level and cite the sources that justify it, using a “Derived from” reference to the original material. You don’t need to reveal who originally classified the information—the Original Classification Authority. The identity of the OCA isn’t a required part of the derivative marking, and including it isn’t necessary for handling or declassifying the document. This keeps the focus on the basis for the current classification (the cited sources) rather than on who made the original decision. For example, you would mark the document with its classification level and list the source documents that justify it, such as “Derived from [Source A], Secret (date),” and/or “Derived from [Source B], Top Secret (date),” rather than naming the OCA.